Editorial Standards
In an industry built on trustless technology, we strive to be a trusted node. Our editorial process applies engineering rigor to financial journalism.
1. The Verification Stack
We do not rely on rumors. Every claim made in our articles undergoes a multi-layer verification process, similar to a transaction requiring multiple confirmations.
| Layer | Verification Method |
|---|---|
| L1: On-Chain Data | We verify liquidity claims using explorers (Etherscan, Solscan) before reporting on market cycles. |
| L2: Source Code | For technical guides, we inspect documentation to ensure accurate distinction between TRC20 and ERC20 standards. |
| L3: Financial Logic | We stress-test economic claims. If a project promises unsustainable yields, we flag it as high-risk. |
2. Independence from "Hype"
We actively avoid "shilling." When we discuss trending assets like Shiba Inu or Dogecoin, we focus on retail sentiment analysis and on-chain volume, not price pumping.
3. Use of AI & Automation
LensCrypto leverages AI for data sorting and syntax checking, but never for final analysis. The human psychology of investing is too complex for current language models to interpret accurately without expert oversight.
- Human-in-the-Loop: All content is reviewed by our lead analyst, Joko Prayitno.
- Fact-Checking: AI hallucinations are mitigated by cross-referencing primary sources.
4. Corrections Policy
Accuracy is a continuous process. If we make an error in a calculation—such as in our FIFO vs LIFO tax examples—we will issue a transparent correction at the top of the article.